Additionality & baseline
What evidence supports an outcome beyond what would otherwise have happened?
A practical starting point for a project review, rather than a quality rating or certification.
ICVCM provides a ten-principle benchmark. Program eligibility and approval of the relevant category or methodology are separate parts of its assessment. Confirm the actual credit’s status rather than relying on a program name. [1] ICVCM [2] ICVCM
What evidence supports an outcome beyond what would otherwise have happened?
Which methodology, assumptions, deductions and uncertainties determine the credited volume?
How long is storage expected to last, and how are losses monitored and addressed?
Who validated and verified the activity, and where are their reports?
Can you identify the registry, serial numbers, vintage and retirement beneficiary?
Where are consent, benefit-sharing, grievance and environmental safeguard records?
Nature-based, engineered, reduction and removal approaches each require project-specific evidence. No credit is approved by this website.
Record your evidence gaps in the planner