World Carbon Credits
QUALITY & INTEGRITY

Ask for evidence.
Keep asking.

A practical starting point for a project review, rather than a quality rating or certification.

ICVCM provides a ten-principle benchmark. Program eligibility and approval of the relevant category or methodology are separate parts of its assessment. Confirm the actual credit’s status rather than relying on a program name. [1] ICVCM [2] ICVCM

01

Additionality & baseline

What evidence supports an outcome beyond what would otherwise have happened?

02

Quantification

Which methodology, assumptions, deductions and uncertainties determine the credited volume?

03

Permanence & reversals

How long is storage expected to last, and how are losses monitored and addressed?

04

Independent verification

Who validated and verified the activity, and where are their reports?

05

Ownership & double counting

Can you identify the registry, serial numbers, vintage and retirement beneficiary?

06

People & safeguards

Where are consent, benefit-sharing, grievance and environmental safeguard records?

A project type is not a quality verdict.

Nature-based, engineered, reduction and removal approaches each require project-specific evidence. No credit is approved by this website.

Record your evidence gaps in the planner